Insurance Coverage Desk

Diabetes Association Chief Apologizes, Vows to Rebuild Trust

By 11/06/2026 3 min read 13 views
Diabetes Association Chief Apologizes, Vows to Rebuild Trust - diabetes association trust
Diabetes Association Chief Apologizes, Vows to Rebuild Trust

Five days after security personnel removed five members from the American Diabetes Association’s annual scientific sessions in New Orleans, the group’s chief executive apologized for the expulsions and promised to rebuild trust with the research community.

Charles Henderson, the ADA’s CEO, issued a three‑minute video apology on Wednesday directed at the doctors who were escorted out for distributing copies of an editorial that criticized federal research cuts.

“First and foremost, I want to personally apologize to Dr. Steven Kahn, Dr. Desmond Schatz, Dr. Aaron Kelly, Dr. Maureen Gannon, and Dr. Justin Ryder, who were escorted out and denied access to scientific sessions, regardless of the circumstances that led to those events,” Henderson said. “I recognize the impact that experience had on each of you. I am deeply sorry for the hurt, frustration, and the pain that resulted.”

Related: UnitedHealthcare lactation billing feud and fake strokes

What sparked the confrontation

The incident happened Friday at the ADA’s annual conference in New Orleans. The five researchers were handing out copies of an editorial published in one of the ADA’s own journals. The piece, labeled as representing the views of its authors and not the association, raised concerns about reduced funding and changes to the grant‑making process at the National Institutes of Health.

The timing was notable.

NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya had originally been scheduled as the conference’s keynote speaker but withdrew. In his place, NIH senior adviser Richard Woychik was speaking in the hall outside where the editorial was being distributed.

Police and security officers marched the five people out of the conference center. People at the meeting described the scene as stunning. As word spread, many attendees expressed disbelief that the ADA would suppress viewpoints critical of Trump administration policies.

Related: Durbin says Trump lets Big Tobacco target children

“I actually, literally, when I heard that this happened, I thought it was a joke,” John Buse, a former president of the ADA, told the outlet on Monday. “To me, it was inconceivable.”

Apology and next steps

The CEO acknowledged the damage. “I have heard your voices, I understand your concerns, and I know that trust, once shaken, must be earned back through actions and not just words,” he said.

He also apologized to the broader membership, many of whom he said were disturbed and disappointed by what occurred. The organization has commissioned a review of the Friday events and its response over the weekend, when initial statements defended the removal and later cited IRS rules governing 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations.

Henderson said the ADA remains committed to advocating for NIH funding. “The group will continue to advocate for robust NIH funding, support the pursuit of scientific discovery, and advocate for the broader research community whose work advances knowledge, drives innovation, and ultimately improves the lives of people living with diabetes, obesity, and related conditions.”

Related: NewLimit raises 435 million for life extension

Buse called the apology a good start. “Follow‑through on the steps outlined will be the next step. And explicit clarification of the rights of ADA members and policies of ADA staff will seal the deal.”

Trust and healing

Henderson struck a personal note near the end of his statement. “What transpired is not reflective of who I am, the values I hold, or the way I was raised,” he said. “I will work hard to bring our community back together to build on the progress we have collectively made for those affected by diabetes.”

The question now is whether the apology and the promised review will be enough to restore confidence among researchers who felt the organization chose silence over scientific debate. The ADA has not yet released details of the review process or a timeline for its findings.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *